This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Vincent, J-L Articles by Creteur, J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vincent, J-L Articles by Creteur, J Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Withholding and withdrawing life prolonging treatment in the intensive care unit: a current European perspective

J Berré

J Creteur

Department of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Belgium

Background:Many deaths are now preceded by an end of life decision, particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU), but such practices vary considerably between countries, ICUs and individuals, depending on many factors including cultural and religious background, family and peer pressure and local practice. Aims:In this review, we will discuss the application of the four key ethical principles-beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy and distributive justice - to withdrawing/withholding decisions. Methods: Drawing data from several national and international studies, we then summarize the current situation across Europe regarding such practices before making some suggestions as to how we could facilitate the often difficult decision making process by improved communication between staff, patient and relatives.

Key Words: beneficence • communication • end of life decisions • ethics • nonmaleficence, patient autonomy

Chronic Respiratory Disease, Vol. 1, No. 2, 115-120 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/1479972304cd021rs


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?